Philip Gater BEng, MIET, MCMI
Philip is a graduate Electronics Engineer with a lot of Management experience both at a project and a board director level. He is a Member Institute Engineering and Technology and a Member of the Chartered Institute of Management which reflects the diversity of his experience. He has worked may years in the Security Industry involving secure access and secure payment. He was the creator of the Flexicard product range. Prior to this he was involved in the traffic industry where he created a range of traffic Safety systems for automatic speed warning and too close warning and the first microprocessor controlled toll booth control in Britain.
Philip says :"I am a great believer in engineering and that engineers can provide the solutions to many problems as they apply science to practical problems".
On this page he has included a couple of items which reflect a similar sense of humour to his wife Debbie.
Engineers 10 Commandments
Product cost includes the shipping installation and ongoing maintenance costs considering these in your value engineering makes it too easy for sales.
Remember that changes to the specification after you start development absorb resources even if you only consider them. Changes get progressively more disruptive the nearer you are to completion. The chances of disruption are increased by not ensuring that ALL Stakeholders buy in to the specification and time plan before committing significant resources and never see a "look and feel" prototype any time during the project. If you embrace changes at every stage it provides a perfect excuse and culprit for late delivery.
If the team hit a snag coming back with fresh minds, preferably next day is not very macho. Neither is trying for a few easy victories elsewhere on the project.
Misunderstandings at project meetings may waste effort but allow the manager to look superior. Summarising the main points of agreement at the end of the meeting and issuing project meeting notes immediately following the meeting make it too easy for the team.
In the rush to complete the project future maintenance requirements are sometimes neglected. For example minimised logic and uncommented firmware require a more expensive level of expertise to maintain and assist in your future job security.
Handbooks get thrown away with the packing or hijacked by a "manual squirrel", if you don't allow for this in the labelling and function it will ensure that the ensuing problems are blamed on the installer.
Reversing disorder, like an untidy desk, takes a lot of effort but makes you look busy.
Celebrating the innovations of every team member and none of your own is not good for your ego and risks increasing their ability to innovate and cause you future ego damage.Demonstration of developments often fail or exhibit anomalous behaviour. If you prepare for them the day before and always have a backup plan this could loose the opportunity to practice your fast talking and look superior.
At the start of any project, particularly an inherited project, offering a realistic risk assessment but quietly planning to exceed expectations, like Scotty of Startreck, is just a bit too sneaky!
The Engineers Wheel (Adaptation by Philip)
(A strong message of this tale is the importance of design risk assessments)
An Engineer told me before he died
And I've no reason to think that he lied
He had a wife who spent cash far and wide
But she was never never satisfied
And so he built a coin minting wheel
With coins of brass and die of steel
All the works were lubricated by cream
And the whole massive issue was driven by steam
Then round and round went the engineers wheel
In an out went the coin die of steel
Until at last the poor lady had cried
Enough enough coin I'm satisfied
Now we come to the tales tragic bit
There wasn't any means of stopping it
And so She was buried from toe to head
Covered all over with coins and dead